Hasan Piker sues Scott Jennings for $72.5 million over edited clip
The streamer claims the CNN commentator twisted his sarcasm into a sincere endorsement of lynching in a viral video.
By Elijah Davidson ·

Hasan Piker, a socialist streamer based in California, filed a defamation lawsuit against Scott Jennings, a political commentator for CNN, seeking $72.5 million in damages. The complaint, lodged Tuesday in the US district court for the District of Columbia, alleges that Jennings misrepresented Piker's words to portray him as a violent racist who supported the lynching of Black people.
Piker contends that Jennings deliberately distorted his remarks to present them as sincere views. According to the filing, Jennings told podcast listeners that Piker had a plan of returning the country to lynchings. He later posted on social media that Piker said the United States should resume lynchings against Black people. Piker argues these claims were false and that Jennings stripped away key context from a 42-second video clip.
The dispute centers on an August 2024 Twitch broadcast where Piker was mocking a Black commentator. That commentator had suggested that woke district attorneys harmed Black Americans and asked if society could return to a time when lynchings were common. Piker summarized this stance on air, saying, He said, We need more Klansmen, okay? Can we go back to a better time when lynchings were happening? This is what I like as a Black man. The lawsuit states that Jennings edited the footage to remove the phrase he said, turning a sarcastic observation into a first-person statement of belief.
Jennings played the manipulated clip on his podcast on August 11 and added a caption presented as a direct quote: Let's go back to a better time when lynchings were happening. The court document asserts that Piker never uttered those words and that they do not appear in the original broadcast or the edited video. Jennings also noted in an August 11 post on X that Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic candidate for a US Senate seat in Michigan, was Piker's best pal and campaign partner.
The complaint notes that Jennings was publicly known to be in the running to become Donald Trump's White House press secretary at the time of the podcast. Piker's team argues this gave Jennings an additional reason to attack a prominent left-wing commentator whom the President had criticized. Piker is requesting a jury trial and seeks $27.5 million in compensatory damages plus $45 million in punitive damages. Jennings has not commented publicly on the lawsuit.
Source: The Guardian





